Finnish Education in Australia

Australian interest in Finnish education has grown steadily since the early 2000s, when Finland's early PISA results first drew international attention, and it has deepened as Australian early years providers and primary schools look for ways to make play, wellbeing and inquiry central rather than incidental to learning.

Why Australian educators keep circling back to Finland

Australia has never lacked confidence in its own curriculum design. ACARA's F-10 Australian Curriculum is thorough, nationally consistent on paper, and regularly reviewed, most recently updated to Version 9 in 2022. Yet many Australian educators, particularly in the early years and primary sectors, have long been curious about Finland, a country that reached the top of the first PISA rankings without standardised testing, private tutoring culture or long school days. ACARA itself has conducted comparative research into Finnish teaching and learning, which says something about how seriously the system is studied rather than simply admired from a distance.

The interest tends to sharpen around two questions: how Finland gets such consistent outcomes across such a small, relatively homogeneous population, and whether the play-based instincts already present in Australia's Early Years Learning Framework could be extended further into the primary years. That second question is where most of the practical experimentation, and most of OPPI's affiliated interest, actually sits.

Where Finnish and Australian approaches differ, and where they meet

The two systems are closer than they first appear. Australia's Early Years Learning Framework already treats play as a legitimate vehicle for learning rather than a break from it, which is precisely the premise behind Finnish pedagogy. The gap opens up once children move into Foundation and the primary years, where Australian classrooms typically organise learning by the Curriculum's eight discrete key learning areas, while Finnish primary classrooms increasingly borrow from phenomenon-based learning, grouping subjects around real questions and projects rather than teaching them in isolation.

Assessment is another point of contrast. Australian primary students sit NAPLAN at set points in their schooling, while Finland has built a national reputation on teaching well and testing rarely, trusting teachers to assess understanding continuously rather than through a single external instrument. Neither approach is right or wrong on its own; the practical opportunity for Australian schools is to borrow Finland's confidence in teacher judgement without needing to dismantle anything that already works locally.

What a Finnish-inspired classroom looks like in an Australian school

In practice, Finnish-inspired settings in Australia have started at the early years end, which is where HEI Schools centres in Victoria operate, blending the Early Years Learning Framework with the HEI Schools curriculum from Finland. The result is recognisably Australian in its regulatory compliance and staffing, but Finnish in its daily rhythm: long uninterrupted play blocks, small mixed-ability groupings, and a deliberate lack of hurry around literacy and numeracy milestones in the earliest years.

Further up the primary years, schools exploring the model tend to introduce longer thematic blocks in place of tightly timetabled subjects, build in daily outdoor time regardless of weather, and use tools such as Eduten's Finnish-built mathematics platform to support individual pacing without turning practice into competition. None of this requires abandoning the Australian Curriculum's content, since Finland's own national curriculum works the same way, setting broad outcomes and leaving the method largely to the teacher.

What OPPI affiliation looks like for an Australian school

OPPI affiliation gives Australian early years centres and primary schools a structured way to adopt Finnish pedagogy without simply importing a Finnish brand wholesale. That means mapping Finnish teaching methods, such as phenomenon-based projects, low-stakes formative assessment and daily outdoor learning, onto the Australian Curriculum's existing key learning areas and the Early Years Learning Framework, rather than replacing them.

For school leaders, the process usually starts with teacher training, since Finland's model depends far more on how teachers plan and collaborate than on any single classroom resource. From there, affiliated schools typically phase Finnish practices in year by year, beginning in the early years and lower primary where the K-5-first logic of Finnish education applies most directly, before deciding how far to extend it into the upper primary years.

Australian interest in Finland has rarely been about copying a system wholesale. It has been about asking why a small, unglamorous country with no standardised testing culture keeps producing calm, capable learners, and whether the answer travels.

Frequently asked questions

Related reading