Finnish Pedagogy vs the British National Curriculum
England's National Curriculum sets out detailed, tested content for every year group. Finland sets broad national goals and trusts teachers to decide how pupils get there. Neither approach is wrong, but they look very different in a K-5 classroom.
- England's National Curriculum is detailed and closely specified; Finland's core curriculum sets broad goals that schools and teachers interpret locally.
- England uses national tests at multiple points in primary school; Finland has no national exams until the end of upper secondary education.
- Finnish teachers hold a master's degree and are given wide freedom over teaching methods; England's curriculum leaves schools comparatively little room to depart from set content.
- Both systems place children in school from around age five, though Finland delays formal, subject-based instruction until age seven.
How much the curriculum specifies
England's National Curriculum lays out what should be taught, and often when, in considerable detail, leaving schools little room to depart from it. Finland's national core curriculum instead states broad goals and lets individual schools and teachers decide how to reach them, an approach that assumes a high level of trust in the teaching profession.
Testing: a running measure vs a single milestone
England's system relies on national standardised tests at several points in primary school. Finland takes the opposite approach, with no standardised testing until the matriculation exam at the end of upper secondary school, relying instead on ongoing teacher assessment.
Teacher autonomy and the school day
Finnish teachers have significant control over both method and pacing, within a shorter, more relaxed school day broken up by regular outdoor breaks. English primary schools tend to run a more scheduled day, shaped by the need to cover specified content and prepare for assessment points.
Frequently asked questions
Does Finland have a national curriculum at all?
Yes, but it is considerably broader and less prescriptive than England's, setting goals rather than detailed, tested content. See how the Finnish national curriculum works.
Which system tests pupils more during primary school?
England, which uses national tests at several points; Finland has none until the end of upper secondary school.
Is one system simply better for young learners?
Both aim for strong outcomes through different routes: England through consistency and clear specification, Finland through flexibility and trust. See is Finnish education really the best? for a balanced view.
Related reading
Bring Finnish pedagogy to your school
OPPI affiliates a selective cohort of schools each year for its K-5 Finnish-pedagogy programme, backed by Education Finland. Tell us about your school and our team will reach out.
Backed by Education Finland. Over 20 schools have already affiliated, including DPS, Radcliffe and Sanctus. Places in each cohort are limited.
Apply to the affiliation cohort →