Finnish Pedagogy vs Colombia's Education System
Colombia has spent the last decade extending the school day and building a national testing system to track quality across a large and varied country, while Finland has built its reputation on the opposite instinct: a short school day and almost no formal testing in the primary years. Here is how the two compare, point by point.
- Colombia's Ministry of National Education sets a national curriculum through básica primaria, five grades covering roughly ages six to eleven, delivered under standards that each school then adapts into its own institutional education project.
- Colombian pupils sit national Saber tests at set points, including the Saber 3° and Saber 5° tests during primary school, whereas Finnish pupils are not subject to standardised national testing in the K-5 years.
- Class sizes in Colombian public primary schools are reported at around 24 pupils, noticeably larger than Finland's average of roughly 20 pupils per class in basic education.
- Colombia's jornada única reform is extending the school day toward roughly 25 weekly hours for primary pupils and moving many schools away from split morning and afternoon shifts, while Finland's school day has long been short and consistent with light homework.
- Colombia's PISA scores have improved across recent testing cycles, and both countries continue to invest in professionalising their teaching workforce, albeit through different routes.
Curriculum structure: national standards versus a slim national core
Colombia's Ministerio de Educación Nacional sets broad basic competency standards and curricular guidelines, and individual schools translate these into their own Proyecto Educativo Institucional, giving schools real say over how they teach, alongside subjects such as bilingualism in English, use of technology and work related competencies built into the national policy framework. Básica primaria covers five grades for children roughly aged six to eleven, structured similarly in scope to Finland's early primary years.
Finnish pedagogy starts from an even shorter national core curriculum and leans further into local and teacher level interpretation, particularly through phenomenon based learning that blends subjects around real world themes. Both systems, in other words, give schools meaningful room to adapt national guidance, but Colombia layers in more standardised testing to check that adaptation is producing consistent results across very different regions and school types.
Assessment and exams: Saber testing versus formative feedback
Colombia runs a well established national testing programme, with the Saber 3° test near the start of primary school and the Saber 5° test at the end of básica primaria, alongside Saber 9° and Saber 11° later on. These tests give the Ministry of Education comparable data across the country's public and private schools, which matters in a system with significant regional variation in resourcing.
Finland takes a different route in the primary years. Assessment is mostly descriptive and formative, built around ongoing teacher judgement rather than standardised scoring, and there is no national testing equivalent to Saber 3° or Saber 5° for Finnish K-5 pupils. This does not mean Finnish schools ignore data entirely, but the emphasis in the early years sits firmly on feedback that helps a child and their family understand progress, rather than on ranking schools or pupils.
Class size and the school day
Colombia's public primary classrooms average around 24 pupils, and lower secondary classes are typically larger still. Finland's average group size in basic education is close to 20 pupils and has stayed fairly stable, sitting below the OECD average. A smaller, more predictable class size is part of what makes the individualised, low stakes feedback central to Finnish pedagogy practical to deliver.
Colombia's jornada única reform is one of its most significant recent structural changes, gradually extending the school day, roughly 25 weekly hours for primary and more for secondary, and moving schools away from the double shift system that has long split many public schools into separate morning and afternoon cohorts. It is a sensible response to a real capacity constraint. Finland never had double shift schooling to begin with, and its primary day is comparatively short, often finishing in early afternoon, with homework kept light, generally well under half an hour a day.
Teacher training and school level autonomy
Finnish class teachers complete a research based master's degree before qualifying, and entry to teacher education is highly competitive. That academic foundation underpins the autonomy Finnish teachers are given to choose their own methods and pacing within the national curriculum.
Colombia has invested significantly in teacher professional development and in strengthening the link between national standards and classroom practice, and schools have real latitude to shape their own institutional education project around those standards. The two systems arrive at teacher autonomy from different directions: Finland grants it as a starting assumption tied to a uniformly high entry bar, while Colombia builds it up school by school within a more centrally monitored testing framework.
Colombia's jornada única reform and Finland's short school day are aiming at the same outcome, more consistent, higher quality learning time, from almost opposite starting points.
Frequently asked questions
Is Finnish pedagogy better than Colombia's national curriculum?
They are not directly comparable in that way. Colombia's national curriculum and Saber testing system are built to monitor quality and equity across a large, regionally varied country, and Colombian PISA results have improved over recent cycles. Finnish pedagogy offers a complementary set of strengths for the primary years, particularly smaller and more consistent class sizes, formative rather than standardised assessment, and highly trained teachers with day to day autonomy. Most schools in Colombia that adopt Finnish pedagogy do so alongside, not instead of, Ministry of Education requirements.
Do schools in Colombia still need to prepare pupils for the Saber tests if they use Finnish pedagogy?
Yes. Colombian schools registered with the Ministry of Education remain accountable to the national curriculum and testing framework, including Saber 3° and Saber 5° in primary school. Schools that adopt Finnish pedagogy typically layer its methods, phenomenon based learning, play based early years practice and descriptive feedback, on top of the required national standards rather than replacing them.
How does jornada única affect the case for Finnish pedagogy in Colombia?
As Colombian schools move away from split morning and afternoon shifts toward a single, longer school day, they gain more of the continuous instructional time that Finnish pedagogy assumes. A single, well structured school day makes it easier to build in the shorter, more frequent lesson blocks and outdoor breaks that are typical of the Finnish approach.
Why are Colombian class sizes larger than Finland's on average?
Colombia serves a large and rapidly urbanising population with significant regional differences in school infrastructure and funding, which naturally produces more variation, and often larger averages, in public school class sizes than Finland's smaller, more evenly resourced system, which has kept its national average close to 20 pupils per class for years.
Related reading
Bring Finnish pedagogy to your school
OPPI affiliates a selective cohort of schools each year for its K-5 Finnish-pedagogy programme, backed by Education Finland. Tell us about your school and our team will reach out.
Backed by Education Finland. Over 20 schools have already affiliated, including DPS, Radcliffe and Sanctus. Places in each cohort are limited.
Apply to the affiliation cohort →