Finnish pedagogy vs the Estonian education system
Estonia has topped Europe's PISA rankings in science, reading and maths for three cycles running, overtaking Finland in the process. The two systems share a lot of DNA, low-stakes assessment, strong teacher training, and equity as a core goal, but they are not identical, and it is worth being precise about where they differ.
- In PISA 2022, Estonia ranked first in Europe in science and among the top in reading and mathematics, ahead of Finland, Switzerland and Ireland.
- Finland's PISA scores have declined across recent cycles, from 516 in 2018 to 495 in 2022, while Estonia's have held closer to its historic strengths.
- Estonia's most distinctive achievement is equity: the gap between its highest and lowest-performing students is among the smallest in the OECD.
- Finland still performs strongly on measures of teacher quality, student wellbeing and educational equity, even as its PISA scores have slipped.
Why Estonia and Finland get compared
Estonia is a near neighbour of Finland and adopted many similar principles: comprehensive schooling, highly trained teachers and minimal streaming by ability in the early years. In PISA 2022, Estonia became the top-performing European country across science, reading and mathematics, moving ahead of Finland for the third consecutive testing cycle.
It would be easy to read this as Finland's model failing, but the picture is more layered. Finland's PISA rankings have declined from their earlier peak, yet Finland still scores well on student wellbeing and equity, and its fundamentals, teacher training, low-stakes assessment, broad curriculum, remain largely unchanged.
What genuinely differs
One consistently cited factor in Estonia's results is digital literacy and a strong, systematic push on technology integration in classrooms, alongside a national culture that has invested heavily in e-governance more broadly. Estonia has also been credited with maintaining classroom discipline and structure slightly more consistently than some Finnish schools in recent years, according to comparative commentary, even while keeping assessment low-stakes.
Neither country relies on high-stakes standardised testing in basic education, and both keep teacher training rigorous and teacher autonomy high, so a school drawing on "Nordic-Baltic" pedagogy is really drawing on a shared regional philosophy rather than two sharply distinct models.
What this means for a K-5 classroom
For a school outside the region considering either as a model, the practical takeaway is similar for both: build strong foundational literacy and numeracy through varied, low-pressure teaching, invest heavily in teacher training, and avoid ranking young children against each other. Estonia's added emphasis on digital literacy is worth noting separately, and is covered from Finland's side in digital literacy and coding in Finnish schools.
Frequently asked questions
Has Estonia really overtaken Finland in education rankings?
In PISA 2022, yes, Estonia ranked first in Europe in science and near the top in reading and mathematics, ahead of Finland, for the third cycle running.
Does that mean Finland's education model no longer works?
No. Finland's PISA scores have declined from an earlier peak, but it still performs strongly on teacher quality, student wellbeing and equity, and its underlying methods remain influential.
What does Estonia do differently from Finland?
Estonia is particularly noted for its digital literacy programmes and for maintaining some of the smallest gaps between high and low performing students in the OECD.
Related reading
Bring Finnish pedagogy to your school
OPPI affiliates a selective cohort of schools each year for its K-5 Finnish-pedagogy programme, backed by Education Finland. Tell us about your school and our team will reach out.
Backed by Education Finland. Over 20 schools have already affiliated, including DPS, Radcliffe and Sanctus. Places in each cohort are limited.
Apply to the affiliation cohort →