Finnish pedagogy vs the Quebec curriculum
Quebec's provincial curriculum, the Quebec Education Program (QEP), shares Finland's emphasis on competencies over rote content, but organises learning differently, through fixed two-year cycles and nine defined cross-curricular competencies.
- The QEP structures elementary schooling into three two-year cycles: Cycle 1 (grades 1 to 2), Cycle 2 (grades 3 to 4) and Cycle 3 (grades 5 to 6).
- It defines nine cross-curricular competencies grouped into four categories, alongside subject-specific competencies.
- Finland's national core curriculum instead defines seven broader transversal competencies, taught through phenomenon-based, multidisciplinary modules.
- Both systems build learning around broad areas or phenomena rather than isolated subjects, though the underlying structures differ.
Where the two systems agree
Both Quebec and Finland moved away from a purely content-checklist model of the curriculum some years ago, towards defining what students should be able to do with knowledge rather than simply what they should memorise. Quebec's broad areas of learning and Finland's transversal competencies both push schools to connect subjects to real situations rather than teaching them in isolation.
Where they diverge: cycles versus continuous progression
Quebec groups pupils into two-year cycles (1 and 2, 3 and 4, 5 and 6), with competencies assessed at the end of each cycle rather than every single grade. Finland instead uses continuous, year-on-year promotion with no repeated grades built into the structure, and assessment that is formative throughout rather than concentrated at cycle checkpoints.
Quebec also retains some provincial-level standardised assessments at set points in elementary and secondary school, used for system monitoring. Finland deliberately avoids standardised testing across basic education, relying instead on sample-based national assessments and teacher judgement.
What this means for a parent or school comparing the two
A family moving between a Quebec elementary classroom and a Finnish-style one would notice broadly similar goals, competency, collaboration, real-world application, but a different rhythm: Quebec's two-year cycle checkpoints versus Finland's continuous, ungraded early years. Schools adapting Finnish methods in a Quebec-influenced system would likely keep the cycle structure for administrative reporting while shifting daily classroom practice towards phenomenon-based, formative teaching.
Competency frameworks look similar on paper. The real difference between Quebec and Finland shows up in how often, and how formally, a child's progress gets checked.
Frequently asked questions
Is Quebec's curriculum similar to Finland's?
They share a competency-based philosophy, but Quebec organises learning into fixed two-year cycles with periodic checkpoints, while Finland uses continuous, ungraded progression and avoids standardised testing in basic education.
Does Quebec use standardised tests like other parts of Canada?
Quebec does administer some provincial-level assessments at set points, unlike Finland, which relies on sample-based national assessments rather than testing every student.
Related reading
Bring Finnish pedagogy to your school
OPPI affiliates a selective cohort of schools each year for its K-5 Finnish-pedagogy programme, backed by Education Finland. Tell us about your school and our team will reach out.
Backed by Education Finland. Over 20 schools have already affiliated, including DPS, Radcliffe and Sanctus. Places in each cohort are limited.
Apply to the affiliation cohort →