Finnish pedagogy vs STEAM education
STEAM and Finnish phenomenon-based learning both break down subject silos, but they start from different places. Here's how they compare for a K-5 classroom.
- STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, mathematics) is a global curriculum framework built around five named disciplines.
- Finland's national core curriculum does not use STEAM branding; instead, since 2016 it has required at least one extended multidisciplinary learning module for every pupil each year, from grade 1.
- Finnish phenomenon-based learning starts from a pupil-relevant question or phenomenon, then draws in whichever subjects the question needs, rather than fixing the frame to five disciplines in advance.
- Some Finnish-inspired providers, including CCE Finland, market their offering using STEAM language when introducing it to markets already familiar with that term.
What STEAM education means
STEAM extends the STEM model (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) by adding the arts, and is widely used to design cross-subject projects in international and Indian schools. It gives teachers a familiar checklist: does this project touch science, technology, engineering, arts and maths, and is often introduced as a specific block of timetable time or a specialist lab.
What Finland does instead: phenomenon-based learning
Since the 2014/2016 national core curriculum reform, every Finnish comprehensive school pupil takes part in at least one extended multidisciplinary learning module a year, built around a phenomenon such as water, our town or media. Teachers then pull in whichever subjects the phenomenon actually needs, which might include art and technology, or might just as easily include history, languages or physical education. More on this in what is phenomenon-based learning.
Where the two approaches overlap, and where they differ
Both approaches share real common ground: cross-subject projects, real-world problems, and teamwork over isolated worksheets. The difference is mainly structural. STEAM starts by naming five disciplines and looks for projects that fit inside them; Finnish phenomenon-based learning starts from a question and follows it wherever it leads, which may or may not land inside a STEAM frame. Neither is more rigorous than the other; they are simply organised in opposite directions.
Can a school combine the two?
Many schools do, and reasonably so. A STEAM lab or specialist arts and technology programme can sit comfortably alongside phenomenon-based project weeks, since the Finnish approach is about sequencing and pupil ownership of the question more than about which subjects are involved. Schools evaluating a Finnish-inspired programme that uses STEAM language are usually looking at a translation of terms rather than a conflicting method.
Frequently asked questions
Is Finland's curriculum a STEAM curriculum?
Not officially. Finland uses phenomenon-based, multidisciplinary learning modules rather than STEAM branding, though the two approaches overlap in practice.
What is phenomenon-based learning?
A Finnish teaching approach, required at least once a year for every pupil since 2016, where subjects are combined around a real phenomenon or question rather than taught in isolation.
Can STEAM and Finnish pedagogy be combined in one school?
Yes. A STEAM programme and Finnish phenomenon-based project work can run alongside each other without conflict.
Why do some Finnish-inspired schools use STEAM branding?
Because STEAM is a familiar term in many markets; providers sometimes use it to describe multidisciplinary Finnish methods in language local parents already recognise.
Related reading
Bring Finnish pedagogy to your school
OPPI affiliates a selective cohort of schools each year for its K-5 Finnish-pedagogy programme, backed by Education Finland. Tell us about your school and our team will reach out.
Backed by Education Finland. Over 20 schools have already affiliated, including DPS, Radcliffe and Sanctus. Places in each cohort are limited.
Apply to the affiliation cohort →